Skip to main content

"But you look so well"

Yes, I know. I try my best to act normal, not like someone who's been out of the loop for about twenty years. I can be observed to walk in a normal fashion at a normal pace some of the time. Above all, I try to keep smiling.

So I'm aware that it's almost impossible for anyone to grasp what, if anything, is wrong with me. This is an attempt to explain how my illness affects me.

You can read through a tedious list of symptoms here. But the overiding feature is what's known as "post-exertional malaise", except in my case post-exertional paralysis would be more accurate.

How do you describe gravity?

Explaining what it's like to have ME to a healthy person is like trying to explain what gravity is to someone who lives on a planet with no atmosphere. I live subject to these physical forces that constrain almost everything I do, mentally and physically. 

Certain exertions or stresses make my whole system shut down or "crash". Standing still, muscle exertion, various kinds of mental exertion, excessive noise, heat, light, cold, alcohol, chemical fumes. By "crash" I mean a gradual onset of breathlessness, disorientation, confusion and increasing loss of muscle power, until I collapse. The degree of exertion or stress I can withstand fluctuates on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. 

The collapse is not sudden and visible, like epilepsy. It can initially manifest as "fatigue". It is slower and allows me to adapt my behaviour to avoid collapsing in a public space. My adaptation to these physical laws is largely second nature. I've learned to sit down before I collapse, to limit physical exercise to what I can tolerate, and to avoid environments that are going to make me ill. Just like you learned to walk and ride a bike but you'd struggle to explain the mechanism by which you do it. So my behaviour appears seamless to other people when actually there is this calibration of the distance or time till the next seat, or the next rest, happening all the time in my sub-conscious.

But if you take away my adaptive behaviour, the impact of these forces is dramatic. I have been tested for orthostatic intolerance (tilt table test) and for my autonomic nervous system function. Both times I've had to be sent home from hospital in a wheelchair. I steadily lose muscle power to the point of paralysis and eventually my whole body goes into violent convulsions, and I gasp for breath like I'm drowning. Afterwards the paralysis takes hours, days or weeks to wear off. 

This is not accounting for the more or less regular occurrence of  "attacks", where the crash happens spontaneously, not triggered by over-exertion. Like a stroke, the physical and mental impairment that follows an attack can be minimal, or it can take days, weeks or even months to wear off.

I am an Amstrad

Another way to think about it is in terms of processing power. Normal people, if you like, are like modern computers that can manage several applications at once: play high-tech games, surf the internet, play movies, as well as manage spreadsheets. I am that old superseded computer that crashes if you try to have a word processor open at the same time as your email.

Another analogy: imagine we all have engines with five gears. Leading a normal active life involves being in fourth gear most of the day, going up into fifth if you play sport or take exercise. I spent many years never being able to go beyond first gear because my engine would stall if I tried to push into second. Nowadays I can often chug along in third gear for parts of the day and occasionally manage to go up to fourth. Sometimes I'm back down to first or second during a relapse.

The Spoon Theory

My units of energy are small and limited in supply. I've recently been surprised to learn that people with other fatiguing conditions, such as lupus and multiple sclerosis, experience something similar. One person described it as starting your day with a limited number of spoons at your disposal. Each activity of daily living uses up a certain number of them. You have to ration them out carefully so you don't use them all up and have to go into "debt".

This is known as the Spoon Theory, developed by a Christine Miserandino who has lupus. Now all of us who are sick and tired of feeling sick and tired unite and call ourselves "spoonies"!


Popular posts from this blog

Sickness and the Social Model of Disability

This is the first part in a series of blog posts that will explore the uneasy relationship between chronic illness and the social model of disability. From my perspective as a Sick person (more on that controversial word next time) I will explore why people with chronic illness often feel excluded from the Disability Rights Movement (DRM) that emerged out of the social model. But rather than reject the social model I’ll discuss how we, the Sick community, could claim it for ourselves and what a social model of chronic illness would look like. The crucial distinction between impairment and disability lies at the heart of the revolutionary Social Model of Disability that emerged in the 1970s – the model that underpins the disability rights and independent living movements. To paraphrase it simply, impairment is loss of bodily function, whereas disability is disadvantage imposed upon people with impairments due to hostile social attitudes or inaccessible physical environments. 

The politics of stigma with ME/CFS

Last month my “shocking” report with Action for ME, Close to Collapse was released, showing the massive failure of the UK social care system to meet the needs of people with the chronic illness ME (otherwise known by the dreadful term Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) For anyone new to M.E., forget the implication that we’re just “tired all the time”. ME is extremely debilitating, both physically and mentally. In fact, research shows the ME patient population has lower scores for physical function and quality of life of any chronic disease group . So 97% of the 850 people with ME who took my survey needed help with 2 or more activities of daily living like going to the toilet, dressing or getting to a local shop. In terms of the Care Act, this means they met the main threshold of eligibility for social care in England.  Yet only 6% were receiving a social care package.  The news was not “shocking” to the ME community. Neglect, lack of support and even hostility from healt

The future of assessments and social security for disabled people

This is a slightly edited version of notes for a presentation to the ESA roundtable meeting chaired by John McDonnell MP on 29th November 2018. The content is based on previous research work with Spartacus Network, independent research into ESA and the WRAG, research on Access to Work, as well as current research with the Chronic Illness Inclusion Project. The current benefits system was identified as the biggest source of social oppression faced by CIIP participants. We recently completed focus group on designing better social security for people with energy-limiting chronic illness. Introduction The first part of this presentation is four main principles for a new assessment framework. A set of tests that any new system must meet if it is to restore the Human Rights of disabled people. The second part covers points for further discussion. Highlighting areas of current debate and disagreement. Principles 1: Overturn the ideology behind the Hostile Environment, restore digni