Skip to main content


Note to sports editors:
"Spoonie":  a person living with debilitating chronic illness which restricts daily living through exhaustion and/or pain. Origin: Christine Miserandino’s Spoon Theory where counting spoons is a metaphor for the calculated rationing of limited units of energy necessary to get through each day.
Spoonie athletes' disabilities are usually not visible, and cannot normally be overcome with the use of prosthetics or technology. Some use mobility aids such as powered wheelchairs but cannot compete in wheelchair events such as racing or basketball because the upper body is subject to the same degree of pain and weakness as the lower body.
Spoonie athletes generally possess the same quantity of grit, determination and human spirit as other Paralympic athletes. It may be less evident to spectators, however, because spoonilympic events often take place within the athlete’s own home and are not televised.

ME1 Triathlon Event for severely affected athletes.

This event involves performing a sequence of challenges – eating breakfast, having a bath and getting dressed afterwards. Many athletes with this class of impairment transcend their limitations simply by performing one of these feats each day, so to do all three together is a true test of the power of the human spirit against adversity.

The order of activities is crucial: eating must be done first otherwise low blood sugar levels could cause collapse during the succeeding events.  And getting dressed must be done immediately after negotiating the exit from the bath. These athletes are highly sensitive to temperature changes and rapidly experience symptoms of hypothermia if not suitably dressed straight afterwards. Stamina will be near depletion after the second washing activity so the greatest test of endurance comes at this point in the event just after muscle power and balance and agility have been tested to the maximum. Many athletes will simply crawl naked under duvet at this point to keep warm. This may be a good pacing strategy that ensures long term endurance. But ultimately the athlete who dips into their energy reserves, ie going into “spoon debt”,  to complete event the fastest will win Gold. The win will cost them dearly however. The payback from using  up their reserves will prevent them competing in any other event in the season, while the duvet-hibernator may well win out overall in a series of events.

Let's increase awareness of spoonilympic sports: please share your spoonilympic event here!

The Hop, Skip and Slump.

via @hossylass

This event has an element of chance and luck, statistically the odds are stacked on the competitor failing at least one element, and in this non-contact sport the risk of further injury is high.

Given ANY attempted walking, instant and unpredictable loss of use of a limb forces the first element, the hop.
This is followed by the tentative touching of offending limb/foot to the floor, the skip (as most participants will skip this element and repeat the hop stage as an alternative).
The final element is the slump, where the competitor slumps against furniture, walls, or for maximum points, the floor.

Points are awarded for distance travelled and the rate of descent, and a multiplier of potential to break a bone, hurt a bystander or damage to surroundings and possessions.

Competitors with bone disorders such as Osteogenesis Imperfecta (Brittle Bone Disease) usually score highly in this event, though those with conditions such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (dislocations), ataxia and Cerebral Palsy also have high score potentials.


Popular posts from this blog

Sickness and the Social Model of Disability

This is the first part in a series of blog posts that will explore the uneasy relationship between chronic illness and the social model of disability. From my perspective as a Sick person (more on that controversial word next time) I will explore why people with chronic illness often feel excluded from the Disability Rights Movement (DRM) that emerged out of the social model. But rather than reject the social model I’ll discuss how we, the Sick community, could claim it for ourselves and what a social model of chronic illness would look like. The crucial distinction between impairment and disability lies at the heart of the revolutionary Social Model of Disability that emerged in the 1970s – the model that underpins the disability rights and independent living movements. To paraphrase it simply, impairment is loss of bodily function, whereas disability is disadvantage imposed upon people with impairments due to hostile social attitudes or inaccessible physical environments. 

The politics of stigma with ME/CFS

Last month my “shocking” report with Action for ME, Close to Collapse was released, showing the massive failure of the UK social care system to meet the needs of people with the chronic illness ME (otherwise known by the dreadful term Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) For anyone new to M.E., forget the implication that we’re just “tired all the time”. ME is extremely debilitating, both physically and mentally. In fact, research shows the ME patient population has lower scores for physical function and quality of life of any chronic disease group . So 97% of the 850 people with ME who took my survey needed help with 2 or more activities of daily living like going to the toilet, dressing or getting to a local shop. In terms of the Care Act, this means they met the main threshold of eligibility for social care in England.  Yet only 6% were receiving a social care package.  The news was not “shocking” to the ME community. Neglect, lack of support and even hostility from healt

Do No Harm lobby

This is the text of a speech I gave at a lobby of parliament organised by John McDonnell MP on 13.02.19 called Do No Harm . Campaigners told MPs how to reduce the appalling damage to disabled people's lives caused by social security cuts and reforms. Catherine Hale   A hostile environment for disabled people The Windrush scandal revealed how government policies can deliberately make life difficult for its citizens. The same hostile environment has been put in place for disabled people, through welfare reforms that have caused us such suffering and harm, and made us into objects of hostility and distrust. The hostility and suspicion was not accidental. As Mo Stewart, who can’t be here today, has demonstrated, its origins can be found in the writings of two scientists, Gordon Waddell and Mansell Aylward, who’ve advised insurance companies and governments on ways of cutting payouts to sick and disabled people.   Their body of work says that most chronic mental and