Skip to main content

Can we End the Awkward with invisible illness?

Scope ran a great disability awareness campaign recently called End the Awkward. It poked gentle fun at the cringe-making faux pas made by some people in response to other people who look or behave differently.

So what about those of us who are disabled but don’t look different? The good thing about an invisible illness like mine, you might think, is that it gives me a "normality cloak" to hide under and protect myself from the hurt or embarrassment that can arise from people's ignorance or  preconceptions towards difference. By controlling if and when I disclose my disabled identity I can avoid such Awkward Moments as people not knowing how or whether to shake hands with me if I don't have a right arm, for example.

It's true that the normality cloak gives me more control. But the danger with wearing that cloak all the time is that it can turn me invisible too.

I have all kinds of difficulties and needs you can't see at a glance and if I want to exist in the world as opposed to in my own shell I need to elicit a degree of understanding and co-operation from other people that one doesn’t normally expect from strangers. That entails shedding my cloak and "coming out" as Disabled.

For example, I can’t stand up or walk for more than five or ten minutes. I constantly need to sit down but I still wish you to include me in the conversation. There’s a high chance I’ll have to cancel any commitment at short notice due to a flare up in my condition. I need you to not see that unreliability as a blot on my character. I have to go off and have quiet naps all the time. I’ve yet to come across accessibility provisions for venues or events that include a quiet place to lie down. I can’t tolerate background noise, bright light, alcohol. I fear you'll think I'm a party pooper. Sometimes I’m too brain-fogged to answer a simple question. I worry you'll find me conversationally pointless.

Incidentally, there's also the plain fact that I often feel very unwell. It’s hard, even for me, to get over the deep-seated social taboo that being ill, like having sex or picking your nose, is something that should be done in private.

However, when I do come out of my normality cloak, I too face The Awkward. The stock response I get is:

“But you don’t look sick!”

People usually think they’re paying me a compliment. But to me, that phrase opens a whole wriggling can of Awkward worms. It tells me you are disconcerted by my lack of evidence. Am I genuinely disabled, or am I pretending so that I can get a seat on the bus, get out of a chore, or just someone who craves special attention? You might think I'm being paranoid but influential professionals have built their careers on the assertion that people like me are on a spectrum of social deviance, feigning disability more or less consciously for secondary gain. And in Austerity Britain there’s an added twist to my revelation: am I one of the legendary “benefit cheats” you may have read about in the papers? 

Sometimes our own close friends and family can’t bridge the gap between us looking normal and being quite severely disabled. So coming out as Disabled to strangers can feel like placing oneself under suspicion of fraud: too raw, and too risky.

Some severely ill people don’t have the physical capacity to leave their home and face The Awkward at all. But quite a few of us who could get out for a few hours a week end up staying indoors because shedding that normality cloak and risking other people's judgement of our character and credibility is too emotionally fraught. And in avoiding the Awkward we end up alone, left out, invisible.

So how can you help to End the Awkward with invisible illness?

The way to include a person with invisible illness is the same as with any disability: see the person, not the condition; ask what help they need, don't assume you know best; be as flexible and open-minded as you can. Only for us there's an extra plea that foreshadows all the rest. In the words of @theslowlane_ME if I tell you I can't do something

“Believe me. Please. Just believe me.” 


  1. I don't agree with 'see the person, not the condition'. Rather I would acknowledge the person and their condition, and go from there. My illness is a part of me whether I like it or not, and informs most if not all of my interaction with the world in general. If I disclose, I've done it for a reason. I would like to think the person I've disclosed to takes my illness into account and continue to treat me as they would have pre disclosure. Of course that may or may not ever happen, but that is how I would like to think I would interact with anyone who disclosed to me.

  2. I get where you're coming from. My reason for saying that is that sometimes I need to disclose my condition for practical reasons but that doesn't mean I then want to have a whole conversation around How long?/Have I tried taking aloe vera? etc etc. It makes me feel reduced to my diagnosis. Thanks for commenting

  3. Even those of us whose condition is more visible get the constant "have you tried reiki, aloe vera, acupuncture..." etc etc etc - esp if we confess to having chronic pain. Answer (if we dare) - do you not think that after 20+ years we'd have tried most things?! Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sickness and the Social Model of Disability

This is the first part in a series of blog posts that will explore the uneasy relationship between chronic illness and the social model of disability. From my perspective as a Sick person (more on that controversial word next time) I will explore why people with chronic illness often feel excluded from the Disability Rights Movement (DRM) that emerged out of the social model. But rather than reject the social model I’ll discuss how we, the Sick community, could claim it for ourselves and what a social model of chronic illness would look like. The crucial distinction between impairment and disability lies at the heart of the revolutionary Social Model of Disability that emerged in the 1970s – the model that underpins the disability rights and independent living movements. To paraphrase it simply, impairment is loss of bodily function, whereas disability is disadvantage imposed upon people with impairments due to hostile social attitudes or inaccessible physical environments. 

The politics of stigma with ME/CFS

Last month my “shocking” report with Action for ME, Close to Collapse was released, showing the massive failure of the UK social care system to meet the needs of people with the chronic illness ME (otherwise known by the dreadful term Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) For anyone new to M.E., forget the implication that we’re just “tired all the time”. ME is extremely debilitating, both physically and mentally. In fact, research shows the ME patient population has lower scores for physical function and quality of life of any chronic disease group . So 97% of the 850 people with ME who took my survey needed help with 2 or more activities of daily living like going to the toilet, dressing or getting to a local shop. In terms of the Care Act, this means they met the main threshold of eligibility for social care in England.  Yet only 6% were receiving a social care package.  The news was not “shocking” to the ME community. Neglect, lack of support and even hostility from healt

Fulfilling Potential? ESA and the fate of the Work-Related Activity Group

We want Support, not Sanctions (Click here to tell your MP if you agree) The report into Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) that I’ve spent much of the last year producing has been released today. It reveals one more piece of the jigsaw of attacks on the dignity and livelihoods of disabled people under this Government (the scrapping of Disability Living Allowance, the closure of the Independent Living Fund, the notorious Work Capability Assessment and the equally infamous ‘Bedroom Tax’ being others). I have looked at the experience of sick and disabled people like myself, subjected to an aspect of ESA policy that promised to empower us, lift us out of poverty and include us in society. That is, the creation of the Work Related Activity Group (WRAG), which sends us on back-to-work schemes as a condition of receiving sickness benefit (or ESA). Just 5% of us in the WRAG on the main scheme – the Work Programme - have moved into work since 2011. I wrote this report to